Biosteel seeks dismissal of PFAS lawsuit 2023: Scam or Legit? Find Out!

Did you receive a mail about a class action settlement concerning Biosteel seeks dismissal of PFAS lawsuit? This review will help you partake in the class action settlement after confirming the authenticity of the mail.

What Is Biosteel seeks dismissal of PFAS lawsuit?

Bedson claims BioSteel manufactured and sold a blue raspberry flavored sports drink containing harmful per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. Laura Bedson filed a class action lawsuit against BioSteel Sports Nutrition Inc. The class action lawsuit was filed in New York federal court. 

The plaintiffs are represented by Jason P. Sultzer and Daniel Markowitz of The Sultzer Law Group P.C., and Nick Suciu III, Gary Klinger, Erin Ruben, and J. Hunter Bryson of Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, PLLC. 

The case is Bedson, et al. v. BioSteel Sports Nutrition Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-00620, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. 

What Is This Class Action All About?

Plaintiff Laura Bedson claims BioSteel’s blue raspberry flavored sports drink is marketed for its supposed positive health benefits, despite the product allegedly containing PFAS. 

Bedson argues BioSteel uses “consistent and pervasive marketing representations” through both marketing and labeling to make consumers falsely believe the sports drink is good for both them and the environment.

“The presence of PFAS is entirely inconsistent with Defendant’s uniform representations that the Product is clean, eco-friendly, and good for both consumers and the environment,” the BioSteel class action states. 

BioSteel asked a New York federal court to dismiss claims the sports drink maker misleads consumers by labeling its beverages as “eco-friendly” despite them allegedly containing so-called “forever chemicals.” 

A consumer argues Biosteel sports drinks contain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which are long-lasting and linked to numerous health problems. 

BioSteel argues the only proofs presented are “vague and conclusory testing allegations” based on testing the consumer conducted independently that did not explain the process of in any detail. 

The company also argues the proposed class action does not mention whether the lead plaintiff bought or used any BioSteel products that allegedly tested positive for PFAS.

Who Is Eligible?

This settlement benefits all persons who purchased Gain laundry detergent marketed as containing enough product for 32 loads of laundry.

How To Be Part of This Settlement

To partake in this settlement, class member must submit a valid and timely claim on the settlement website.

What Is The Pay For This Settlement?

The pay for this settlement varies and the proof of purchase is not necessary.


As you submit your claim to the settlement website, just like Family files ‘forever chemicals’ lawsuit against 3M class action settlement we have reviewed, you’re doing so under penalty of perjury. You are also harming other eligible Class Members by submitting a fraudulent claim.

Leave a Comment

error: Content is protected !!